오후 11:41
Blower119
입자는 관찰하기 전에는 하나의 파장이다.
관찰하는 순간 입자가 된다.
우리가 경험하는 모든 물질 세계는 우리가 '인식'할 때 물질이 된다.
우리의 육체도 마찬가지.
우리는 누구인가?
우리는 '의식'이다.
2015년 10월 30일 금요일
이중슬릿 실험_관찰자가 물질을 만든다
입자는 관찰하기 전에는 하나의 파장이다.
관찰하는 순간 입자가 된다.
우리가 경험하는 모든 물질 세계는 우리가 '인식'할 때 물질이 된다.
우리의 육체도 마찬가지.
우리는 누구인가?
우리는 '의식'이다.
2015년 10월 29일 목요일
벤티뇨)내면의 진동을 높게 유지하는 법
내면의 진동을 높게 유지하는 법How to Keep Your Frequency High - You Are Loved - Bentinho Massaro LIVE
You are not a beggar, you are a creator.
당신은 외부상황에 휘둘리는 존재가 아니라 창조주입니다.
We forget this outside world is smoke and mirrors, a game of dynamic play of energy inside of consciousness.
That reflects how we play internally with our own beliefs and perspectives, our own observations, definitions, our own interpretations....
우린 '외부세계'가 연기고 거울이란 걸 잊고 삽니다. 의식 에너지로 만드는 다이나믹한 게임이죠.
'외부세계'란 우리의 믿음과 시각, 관찰, 정의내린 것, 해석의 반영일 뿐입니다.
Everything is neutral and meaningless except for you.
모든 것은 중립적이고 의미가 없습니다. 하지만 당신은 아닙니다.
기독교는 바울의 종교
기독교는 예수의 종교가 아닌 바울의 종교
Jesus and St.Paul said differently
전혀 다른 이야기를 하는 예수와 바울
바울은 말로만 자기가 예수의 제자라고 주장하지만 로마서나 사도행전,갈라디아서 등 바울의 저서 어디에도 예수의 사상이나 철학을 언급한 부분이 없다. 하다못해 산상수훈 정도는 말해줘야 하지 않았을까? ... 전혀 없다.
바울은 예수의 가르침에 관심이 없었던 걸로 보인다.
예수는 기존 권력을 인정하지 않았지만 바울은 권력에 대한 복종을 강조한다.
예수는 우리가 신이라 했지만 바울은 그 반대였다.
복음서와 바울의 저서는 아주 다른 성격의 책이다.
간단히 말해, 바울은 자기가 고안한 희생양 교리의 소품으로 예수란 존재를 이용했다고 보면 거의 틀림없다. 그걸 로마가 공인해 오늘날 기독교가 됐다. 그래서 현대 기독교는 예수의 가르침은 뒷전이고 십자가에 매달렸다는 사실에 집착한다.
예수의 가르침은 기독교에서 해석하는 것보다 훨씬, 훨~~~씬 심오하다.
예수는 우리가 신이라 말했다.
천국은 그걸 깨닫는 순간 바로 여기가 된다.
예수는 진실을 보았고 가르쳤다.
하지만 바울은 아니다.
2015년 10월 28일 수요일
알란 와트- 내려 놓아라 Give it away
www.alanwatts.com
www.dreamscene.org
'That what I want, basically, what I really want, is what you want. And I don't know what you want.
Surprise me'.
But that's the kinship between "I" and "thou". So when I ask, I go right down to the question, which we started with: "What do I want?"
The answer is "I don't know".
When Bodhidharma was asked, "Who are you?" which is another form of the same question, he said "I don't know". Planting flowers to which the butterflies come, Bodhidharma says "I know not".
I don't know what I want.
And when you don't know what you want, you reach the state of desirelessness. When you *really* don't know... you see, there's a beginning stage of not knowing, and there's an ending stage of not knowing.
In the beginning stage, you don't know what you want because you haven't thought about it, or you've only thought superficially.
Then when somebody forces you to think about it and go through it, you say, "Yeah, I think I'd like this, I think I'd like that, I think I'd like the other". That's the middle stage.
Then you get beyond that, and say "Is that what I really want?" In the end you say, "No, I don't think that's it... I might be satisfied with it for a while, and I wouldn't turn my nose up at it, but it's not really what I want".
Why don't you really know what you want?
Two reasons, that you don't really know what you want.
Number one: You have it.
Number two: You don't know yourself. Because you never can. The godhead is never the object of its own knowledge, just as a knife doesn't cut itself, fire doesn't burn itself, life doesn't illumine itself. It's always an endless mystery to itself. "I don't know".
And this "I don't know", uttered in the infinite interior of the spirit, this "I don't know", is the same thing as "I love", "I let go", "I don't try to force or control". It's the same thing as humility.
And so the Upanishads say, "If you think that you understand Brahman, you do not understand. You have yet to be instructed further. If you know that you do not understand, then you truly understand, for the Brahman is unknown to those who know it, and known to those who know it not'.
And the principle is that any time you, as it were, voluntarily let up control, in other words, cease to cling to yourself, you have an access to power. Because you're wasting energy all the time in self-defense, trying to manage things, trying to force things to conform to your will.
The moment you stop doing that, that wasted energy is available. And therefore you are, in that sense, having that energy available, you are one with the divine principle. You have the energy! When you're trying, however, to act as if you are god, that is to say, you don't trust anybody and you're the dictator and you have to keep everybody in line, you lose the divine energy, because what you're doing is simply defending yourself.
So then the principle is: the more you give it away, the more it comes back.
Now you say, 'I don't have the courage to give it away. I'm afraid'.
And you can only overcome that by realizing, you better give it away, because there's no way of holding on to it. The meaning of the fact that everything is dissolving constantly, that we're all falling apart, we're all in the process of constant death, and that -
'The Worldly Hope men set their Hearts upon / Turns Ashes - or it prospers; and / Like Snow upon the Desert's dusty Face / Lighting a little Hour or two - is gone
all that Omar Khayyam jazz. You know,
'The cloud-capped towers, the gorgeous palaces, the great globe itself, I, all which it inherit -- shall dissolve, and like this insubstantial pageant faded, Leave not a rack behind.'...
All falling apart. Everything is. That's the great assistance to you. That fact that everything is in decay is your helper. That is allowing you that you don't have to let go, because there's nothing to hold on to.
It's achieved for you, in other words, by the process of nature. So once you see that you just don't have a prayer, and it's all washed up, and that you will vanish and "leave not a rack behind", and you really get with that, suddenly you find that you have the power, this enormous access of energy.
But it's not power that came to you because you grabbed it; it came in entirely the opposite way. The power that comes to you in that opposite way is power with which you can be trusted.'
Music: Ludivico Einaudi - I giorni
<사진: Alan Watts:미국의 선사>
